New blog: Citibankblog. On or about 23 March 2009 Carlo Caramanna refused to honor a check for Derrick Gillenwater, and threatened to arrest him and others when presented with a copy of Your Style v. Mid Town Bank of Chicago, 501 N.E.2d 805 (1986). It should all be on bank video.
They are no doubt pissed as hell that NY Partner Sam Shaulson has lost control of this case, and perhaps they are mad as hell that Citibank lied to Morgan, Lewis about my conduct at the bank. All I know is if they bring a lawsuit I will demand a Jury and then everybody is going to be saying
"Wow, where can I find his blogs....that guy ROCKS!!!...."
This promises to be fun because there's no legal basis for shutting down any of my blogs about Citibank or its lawyers if that's what they're after. Think: Fair Use,opinion, satire, parody guys, I've got y'all covered, think of it as a movement of the Yoots... Or maybe they too, are in search of the Holy Grail.....
PS: We all know Citibank likes to steal from its customers, they lied to Ohio State Students, California AG Brown caught them in flagrante delicto with $14M from poor, deceased customers and continuing with that theme they ganked the estate of Janina Tobolka (who had hip replacement and uterine cancer for Christ's sake) and Marie Olko for $127K until she busted them in NY Court of Appeals for $300K in 2005 hahahaaaa....
Funny how I wrote two days ago that purportedly-damaging video was on its way, but MCAD tells me this morning that it has not arrived, but that they are checking the mail and will give a holler when it arrives.
Here's the rub: Every other time these lying bigot hater-bags sent something when they thought they had me in a corner they sent it FEDEX, I wish I had saved the envelopes for a KingCast picture. I'll keep calling MCAD to see when the Moment of Truth has arrived.
Warning: There better not be any editing going on, I might bring my film maker along with me to look for any splicing. Plus, with multiple cameras there had better be the exchange between Carlo Caramanna and me, you betcha'.
Well what a difference a day makes. After the Scrooge/Dave Chappelle/Strother Martin post quoting Morgan Lewis Partner Sam Shaulson's 25 November promise to "immediately" produce a video in which I allegedly acted inappropriately, MCAD officials tell me that they believe it is en route.
If you will not show us the Grail... we will take your Castle by force!
Remember the Scrooge post in which I noted, inter alia, that Morgan Lewis is a "No Hire Factory?" And who could forget the instant classic Strother Martin "Hard-time That's the way he gets it!" post, noting that Morgan Lewis are such tightwad tools they illegally failed to indemnify one of their own attorneys in a legal malpractice case. Wow.
Well they keep on not giving the gifts, even though the NAACP has given Sam Shaulson and Morgan Lewis' infamous dirt bag scum-sucking rat pig Citibank client a big present that was re-gifted to Yours Truly, i.e. NAACP v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., Citigroup et al., 635 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (2009).
Well now niggardly Morgan Lewis Partner Sam Shaulson is thus far failing to gift over the video that purportedly shows me acting inappropriately at the Citibank South End branch such that manager Carlo Carmanna was justified in not opening a bank account for me even as Citibank opened such an account for my Caucasian girlfriend. She and Derrick Gillenwater will be witnesses at trial. Why is Sam Shaulson being so niggardly about it when his co-counsel, Benjamin Velella tried to threaten my lawyer with the video as their first line of defense many months ago, remember the colloquy:
"Please be advised that we do have video from the South End Branch from March 24 that captures interaction between staff and your clients and have also taken statements from the affected employees." ********* "Sir, I couldn't care less about the self-serving employee statements. The proof is in the video from that day and all other days that you have maintained and that the court will compel you and your client to produce."
And remember what Sam Shaulson wrote to MCAD on 25 November 2009 -- an entire month ago:
"Citibank will immediately produce a copy of the video in question to the MCAD, but asks that the MCAD confirm that a copy of the video will not be provided to Mr. King."
Well we must have some sort of, ummmm... failure to communicate, because in point of fact I have already stipulated that I would abide by the MCAD ruling, which was that the Commission would not compel a video for my own possession, and I will simply sit in the room with them and observe and narrate what is happening, including the fact that Morgan Lewis Attorney Sam Shaulson intentionally lied to the Commission about the fact that Carlo Carmanna was the Decision Maker: It was not the black female teller, their own Position Description proves that because she is not cloaked with the ambit of authority to render such a decision, only he can "Resolve escalated customer complaints/issues promptly and effectively."
I dunno, but a non-negotiated $24,500.00 check is an "escalated customer issue" the last time I checked. So I will provide an Affidavit and Narrative to the Bar Discipline Counsel, which prematurely dismissed my Rule 3.3 Ethics Complaint against the niggardly Morgan Lewis Partner Sam Shaulson. They will probably dismiss it again to protect a powerful attorney like Sam Shaulson but that doesn't diminish the gravity of his deceit, No Sir.
Back story: As one can read in the thumbnails, in 2007 the NAACP gave Citibank poor marks on everything racial except Community Reinvestment Act work, but on further review the NAACP -- the Nation's Oldest Civil Rights Organization (of which I proudly served as Southern NH Legal Chair) -- says they have apparently failed on that as well. Get your popcorn ready for NAACP v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., Citigroup et al., 635 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (2009), Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint DENIED.
(March 11, 2008) The NAACP and lead counsel Brian Kabateck filed papers Friday, March 7, that will fast track their federal class action lawsuit against Washington Mutual, Citi, GMAC and 15 other mortgage firms who systematically steered African American borrowers into predatory loans.
"The victims in this case had the same credit, the same income and the same qualifications as the lenders' other customers. The only difference was the color of their skin. That's why they were stuck with abusive loans," said Kabateck, Managing Partner of Kabateck Brown Kellner, LLP.
"Quickly resolving this case is essential for victims who have ruined credit and who are losing their homes. This isn't just about justice for the victims. This case is about making sure that this kind of discrimination is stamped out for good," said NAACP General Counsel Angela Ciccolo.
What this proves of course inter alia, is that Discrimination need not take place all at the same time, as alleged by Morgan Lewis Partner Sam Shaulson in my case of racial discrimination where they refused to open a bank account for me but opened one for my Caucasian girlfriend. Citibank may well be the sleaziest banking operation in the World: Almost every multinational banking scam involves Citibank. I've been listing Enron, Ohio, California, Mexico, Russia and some of the others here.
See generally the Bah, humbug post from this morning about these money-laundering, student-huckstering, TARP-abusing, scum-sucking racist rat pigs that call themselves Citigroup, Citimortgage and Citibank.
UPDATE: NAACP v. Ameriquest Mortg. Co., Citigroup et al., 635 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (2009), more on this in a new post, but basically NAACP sued Citibank and others for Community Reinvestment Act violations, which effectively removes the only good score they had from the 2007 NAACP report featured below.
But now I see that they were ripping off more schools and students and settled that out for a couple million, no doubt after they already made 40 or 400 times that much through their illegal practices.
If Citibank ever tries to sell you on its commitment to racial diversity or Green investment portfolio, don't believe it because the Green America Responsible Shopper wrote:Citigroup's record proves that its desire for profits come at the expense of environmental and social sustainability.
Citigroup received a “C” grade on the 2007 NAACP Economic Reciprocity Initiative report. The grade reflects a measurement of corporate America's commitment to African Americans and other people of color. Companies were surveyed for their activity in employment, vendor development and contracting, advertising and marketing, dealerships and philanthropy.
The Corporate Library named Citigroup as "worst overall" in its listing of the Ten Worst Large US Boards in 2003....
In May 2004 Citigroup agreed to pay $2.65 billion to investors in WorldCom...
In August 2003 Citigroup Global Markets' brokerage division was fined $1 million by the New York Stock Exchange.....
And hot damn they even had to settle a claim of unlawful discrimination filed by an atheist, so Citibank will stick it to whomever is walking by, apparently. I love the "being a disturbance" line of crap; same one they used on me. This goes straight to MCAD, showing a pattern and practice of conduct by these scum-sucking money laundering rat pigs at Citibank.
And of course we need say no more about Morgan Lewis than the fact that they are considered a No Hire Factory and unlawfully failed to indemnify their own former lawyer for work he performed for Morgan Lewis, see Cassady v. Morgan Lewis, 145 Cal. App. 4th 220; 51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1877 (2006)
Good lord! From the level of frustration indicated on this and other law-related websites, I hope a pre-party walk though a metal detector and a pat-down is on the agenda.
I made sure to remind them of Cassady v. Morgan Lewis, 145 Cal. App. 4th 220; 51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1877 (2006)
"We affirm the trial court's grant of a new trial. Under section 2802, an employer must [***3] indemnify an employee for attorney's fees and costs incurred in defending a third party lawsuit, where such expenses are necessary and the lawsuit is based on the employee's conduct within the course and scope of his or her job duties."
Dear Attorney Friedberg. I am surprised you dismissed the case rather than hold it open pending further discovery. Don't you want to view the videotape in question to see who the Decision Maker was?
I'll be back in touch within 30 days, as MCAD is expecting Attorney Shaulson to present the video to them, then I will review it and provide a step-by-step narrative. I'm sure that Attorney Shaulson will hurry up with that video because after all, it purportedly bolsters his client's position.
But hey Sam, this is The Way you wanted it, now I'm going to give it to you.... I don't like it any more than you, man.
-The KingCaster (a/k/a Strother Martin.) Citibank and Morgan Lewis reads in the past 10 hours: Citicorp Covina California: Citicorp Global Information Network (192.193.221.145) Citicorp Ridgewood, NY: Citigroup (199.67.131.148) Morgan Lewis Philadelphia: Morgan, Lewis Bockius (12.33.108.130) Morgan Lewis Philadelphia: Morgan, Lewis And Bockius (12.53.161.4) Morgan Lewis Washington DC: Morgan Lewis (65.207.69.2)
Remember how I chided Morgan Lewis Attorney Sham Shaulson being glad to see me so he can keep railing up those billables? It was in this post with the KingCast YouTube video where I present to a Criminal Justice class -- as Sam Shaulson and his scum sucking rat client Citibank are steady accusing me of being "suspicious" and dangerous.
Well that's not far from true because if you are an associate and you are late entering timesheets for your billables Morgan Lewis docked your pay, LOL.
It doesn't matter, they're a No Offer Factory; not doing much hiring anyway and they laid off 216 this year. Sam Shaulson says I have a motive to bring a case against Citibank, hell I'll notify MCAD he's got a financial motive to keep on sucking money out of Citibank, even lying as noted in my Rule 3.3 Ethics Complaint forwarded on to Washington DC Managing Partner Grace E. Speights.
PS: Morgan Lewis must be short on money, they stiffed Ralph Cassady after years of dutiful service and got schooled in Court with a remand Affirmed: Cassady v. Morgan Lewis, 145 Cal. App. 4th 220; 51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 527; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1877 (2006)
"We affirm the trial court's grant of a new trial. Under section 2802, an employer must [***3] indemnify an employee for attorney's fees and costs incurred in defending a third party lawsuit, where such expenses are necessary and the lawsuit is based on the employee's conduct within the course and scope of his or her job duties."
It is with deep regret that I write to notify you that Morgan Lewis has a liar in their midst, and he is a Partner no less. Please review the Rule 3.3 Ethics Complaint against Sam Shaulson, who has allowed for spoliation of evidence in my Civil Rights case against Citibank -- even after his client was specifically warned to maintain any and all such video.
I've got news for him: The Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination will request a copy of at least one of the videotapes in question, and when it comes out MCAD will see that the bank's purported legitimate nondiscriminatory rationales for refusing to open a bank account for me as a black male are not worthy of credence per Burdine and McDonald-Douglas.
Be that as it may, I saw that someone from Morgan Lewis with a Philadelphia server was reading this blog on 19 December 2009 at 1:39 pm -- Morgan, Lewis And Bockius (12.53.161.4) and from Washington, DC on 21 December 2009 at 8:32 Morgan Lewis (65.207.69.2) folks were reading the Sam Shaulson blog -- and thought it might be you, given that you head up the diversity program and would be interested in matters of racism.
Please call or write if you have any questions.
UPDATE: Citibank came by to check it out at 4:30 today: ISP Citigroup 199.67.131.148 21st December 2009 16:30 No referring link citibankisracist.blogspot.com/
Pictured: Citi CEO Vikram Pandit, seated with other fat cats, Citi/Morgan Lewis lawyer Sam Shaulson and one of his contemporaries.
KingCast and Bill Christy share as brothers in Citibank misery as stock plummets!
Remember when Bill Christy was writing in last week about how everything was just hunky-dory at Citibank because they couldn't be corrupt because the U.S. Government was about to make some loot from its stock shares?
NEW YORK : Citigroup stock took a beating on Wall Street Thursday after weak demand for a share offering that prompted the US government to delay the sale of its stake in the bailed-out banking giant.
Citi shares tumbled 8.12 percent in early trade to 3.17 dollars and have plunged some 20 percent over the past week. The market action came after Citi said late Wednesday its share offering saw prices of 3.15 dollars per share.
This was well below the average price paid by the US government as part of a multibillion-dollar bailout under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
That prompted the Treasury to delay its plans to divest an initial five billion dollars.
"The US Treasury announced it would extend its lock-up period on the sale of its 7.7 billion share common equity stake to 90 days from 45 days after the completion of this offering," Citigroup said in a statement.
In the Vikram Pandit cam post I ran it all down with information about the fact that almost every multinational banking scam involves Citibank. I've been listing Enron, Ohio, California, Mexico, Russia and some of the others here and at Citibankisracist blog, and of course we will see that Citibank lied when they are forced to produce the bank video in my racial discrimination case against them, MCAD will be requesting that video in the ordinary course of business even though my Motion to Compel it was denied. That denial actually works in my favor because it gives these liars less grounds for appeal should they get smoked at the Commission stage by a Probable Cause determination.
PS: Bill I received an interesting response from Senator Tarr's Office about the correspondence you sent them. I'll be discussing that matter with Senate Counsel next week. I'm chillin' with Oliver Ruff right now and we are really wondering what your role in the whole Franconia Shooting tragedy was really all about.
“The women who took on a banking giant and won a $33m sexism case."
"A trio of women who battled against discrimination in the male-dominated world of American finance have won a $33m (£16m) legal settlement that will compensate thousands of underpaid female employees and marks another step in the fight against sexism, bullying and unequal pay on Wall Street."
Pictured: Citi CEO Vikram Pandit, seated with other fat cats, Citi/Morgan Lewis lawyer Sam Shaulson and one of his contemporaries.
Well I figured since some of My Friends spy on me, I will spy on Vikram Pandit-- The Most Powerless Powerful Man on Wall Street, who inherited a poop-show and who was MIA from the Presidential summit. He was no doubt busy getting out from under the Pay Czar so he and his corporate pals could keep on raping, pillaging and plundering America and the rest of the Free World, as noted. Bill Christy of the Bill Christy Project seems to think that just because the government stands to make some loot off of Citibank that Citibank's corruption and theft is A-OK, as noted in the above link. But the President and Robert Scheer apparently disagree with that assessment. I call them scum sucking rats, while the President prefers "fat cats," at least in public. Scheer quotes President Obama and writes:
“I did not run for office to be helping out a bunch of fat cat bankers on Wall Street.”
But whatever his intentions, Barack Obama has in fact accomplished just that, to the immense anger of the public that elected him. Thus, it is understandable that, in his “60 Minutes” interview last Sunday, Obama lashed out at the ingrate bankers whose greed he had served but who have failed to seriously increase lending or forestall foreclosures and instead shamelessly pocketed the cash the government threw their way:
“They’re still puzzled why is it that people are mad at the banks. Well, let’s see,” he said. “You guys are drawing down $10 [million], $20 million bonuses after America went through the worst economic year that it’s gone through in—in decades, and you guys caused the problem. And we’ve got 10 percent unemployment.”
Citigroup Chief Executive Vikram S. Pandit couldn’t make the meeting with the president who had saved his corporation from bankruptcy because he was too busy lining up new private financing to allow Citigroup to escape the bonus confines and other limits stipulated by the government bailout program. No bank bears greater responsibility for the economic debacle that has caused such worldwide suffering than Citigroup, whose immense growth was made possible by legislation that Summers and his then-mentor, Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, successfully promoted in the late 1990s. Rubin was rewarded for his efforts with a top job at Citigroup........
It was Rubin, as an Obama adviser, who pushed for Pandit’s selection as head of Citigroup. Perhaps Obama could enlist Rubin’s aid in getting Pandit to accept the president’s invitations to the White House. But of course there is no expectation of getting Rubin and Pandit to pay back the bankrupted homeowners they swindled.
Almost every multinational banking scam involves Citibank. I've been listing Enron, Ohio, California, Mexico, Russia and some of the others here and at Citibankisracist blog, and of course we will see that Citibank lied when they are forced to produce the bank video in my racial discrimination case against them, MCAD will be requesting that video in the ordinary course of business even though my Motion to Compel it was denied. That denial actually works in my favor because it gives these liars less grounds for appeal should they get smoked at the Commission stage by a Probable Cause determination.
Wherefore I hereby suggest we fire up the Vikram Pandit cam(TM) as he jets around looking for more ways to fleece America and the World Public. Daily Kos knows what time it is.
I just received notice today that Citibank will not have to produce the video that they initially threatened my lawyer with, and MCAD will not strike whatever materials that Citibank filed regarding me regarding failed attempts at prosecution by NH AG Kelly Ayotte and her pals.
Whether or not MCAD will consider the successful and continued attempts at prosecution by California or Ohio AGs against Citibank, or other evidence of deceit on their part as assisting money laundering noted by the GAO remains to be seen, as Citibank did not move to strike it and there was no written rationale, just an initialed rubber stamp.
I will file a Motion to Reconsider tomorrow morning, with the caveat to Sam Shaulson being that when I worked for Ohio Civil Rights Commission (OCRC) they would often deny a claimaint's Motion to Compel, but subsequently seek it in their own discovery process, which has not yet begun. So don't go destroying that video, Counselor ;)
PS: There was no sex involved in this case, but plenty of lies -- all by Citibank -- and videotape. Frankly, I don't think MCAD wants to get involved in the posting of any video so they are going to control that process exclusively for the time being.
Actually, I warned you that the continued TARP bailout would include the cheap Citibank shares for public consumption a couple of days ago. Now it has come to pass although it certainly isn't being widely mentioned.
That's what the SEC, GAO and at least two Attorneys General and Common Sense already told you in case you don't want to hear it from KingCast. I said it today on Air and I will say it every time it occurs to me:
Boycott Citibank for its history of money-laundering, client theft and deception and its scum-sucking thieving rat pig ways, in general.
PS: The banks in this Country help to ruin life for the little people and then the evidence too often disappears from the Internet. Remember my friend Milan Kohut and the nooses he allegedly "criminally peddled" (background) as he was protesting the banking industry's role in the mortgage crises? Now I have to dig into my old emails to find the pictures because none of them even appear in a Google search. I know his story -- he was a heavy in the Czech Velvet Revolution -- was featured in the Boston Phoenix, but try a Google search on that. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Interesting, n'est-ce pas? But I had a copy and I did also locate a picture of him in Court though, he-heh-heh.
The Internet my friends, is a dangerous and slippery place, remember that. And to the haters, the knife cuts both ways.
Attached please find the press release from Edmund Brown Esq.
It is interesting how the best Citibank can do with AGs and me is to point to a busted case involving lawful use of the First Amendment pursuant to NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, 459 U.S. 898 (1982) and NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963), but I can point to actual Findings of Fact and Law from AGs in Ohio and California (and the GAO and soon the SEC) that Citibank is indeed a false and deceptive criminal enterprise....
Now then as to the Motion to Dismiss that effectively ended the bogus case against me, I wrote that with David Horan, dig it:
Don't look now -- well okay look if you must -- but people at Daily Kos are saying the same exact thing that I just said about the scum sucking rats at Citibank and their TARP loans:
They know exactly what they're doing. (8+ / 0-) Failure and irresponsible behavior are profitable to them. This behavior on a gigantic scale makes it necessary for the taxpayer to bail them out. The system of reckless behavior and corrupt, senseless investment is working for them.
by Linda Wood on Tue Dec 01, 2009 at 10:37:46 AM PST
Vikram Pandit is the last man standing—and he can’t be enjoying the fact.
The surprise move by Bank of America to sell $19 billion of new equity in order to repay at least some of the $45 billion in TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) that giant bank owes the Treasury Department and taxpayers leaves Citigroup as the only one of the large Wall Street players to not yet make a dent in its TARP debt. But then, there doesn’t seem to be a single problem area worldwide to which Citigroup hasn’t managed to have some exposure, from subprime mortgage-backed CDOs to the shifting sands of Dubai’s real estate market.
In short, Citigroup can’t afford to turn off government life support by repaying TARP funds; if it did, odds are high that the institution would promptly flat-line. At the same time, Pandit faces a nasty catch-22. If he doesn’t start paying back TARP funds quickly, he’ll have a growing PR problem with his customers, who may well prefer to deal with a financial institution that doesn’t have to cling to the government to avoid collapse.
Related Kos thread: How scum bucket large U.S. banks keep your money forever and earn interest when you go to cash a check, they use that money to pay their top executives healthy bonuses.
Atty. General Brown Forces Settlement with Citibank: Investigation Reveals Bank Was Stealing From Its Customers
California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced that he has reached a settlement with Citibank after a three-year investigation into the company’s use of an illegal “account sweeping” program. Nationally, the company took more than $14 million from its customers, including $1.6 million from California residents, through the use of a computer program that wrongfully swept positive account balances from credit-card customer accounts into Citibank’s general fund.
“The company knowingly stole from its customers, mostly poor people and the recently deceased, when it designed and implemented the sweeps,” Attorney General Brown said. “When a whistle blower uncovered the scam and brought it to his superiors, they buried the information and continued the illegal practice.”
In July of 2001, a Citibank employee uncovered the practice and brought it to the attention of his superiors. The employee was later fired for discussing the credit sweeps with an internal audit team. In the words of a Citibank executive, "Stealing from our customers is a business decision, not a legal decision." The same executive later said that the sweep program could not be stopped because it would reduce the executive bonus pool.
And the U.S. isn't going to let Citi out of TARP without coming up with a way of dealing with those $301 billion in sick assets, according to BusinessWeek......So the answer for Citi appears to be raising about $20 billion in new capital from investors. That funding could come in the form of $10 billion in equity and $10 billion of other securities. At about $4 a share, Citi is trading at a significant discount to the assets on its books. And one analyst told BusinessWeek: "People will think it's a great deal."
Problem is, the books are probably wildly optimistic. Citi hold many complex assets with the potential for becoming toxic. And don't forget the assets off Citi's books -- called special purpose entities (SPEs), which helped wipe out Enron. Citi has $996.6 billion worth of SPEs. I'm not sure we can be confident that these will not blow up -- particularly considering that they consist of highly risky paper from student loans, subprime mortgages and credit card receivables.
Considering the troubled assets Citi is holding that have yet to recover, if the U.S. lets it sucker some investors into buying equity so it can pay back the $20 billion TARP -- and go back to the days of high risk and huge bonuses -- taxpayers will end up being saddled with a bigger bill further down the road.
This scum-sucking rat post contains all the relevant links that show the history of Citibank's brand of corporate criminality and/or deception, all over the World, including Enron, Ohio, California, Mexico, Russia. For more visit Citibankisracist blog.
The hits keep coming for Attorney Sam Shaulson (pictured, left) and the scum bucket Citibank rats who opened a can of worms they can't shut now at MCAD. See, the Citibank scum buckets accused me of being a scammer, but they wrote the book on it and now they are trying to scam MCAD.
"Citigroup Inc. is in the early stages of negotiating with the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle an investigation into whether it misled investors by not properly disclosing the amount of troubled mortgage assets it held as the market began to implode in 2007, people familiar with the matter say.
Among issues being debated inside the SEC is whether, as a recipient of government-rescue funds, Citigroup should pay a large penalty in the case. There is concern at the SEC about the notion of financial firms in effect using taxpayer money to pay penalties, people close to the situation say. Citigroup received $45 billion from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program and plans to raise an additional $5.5 billion in capital from private investors."
Wowzers. Yet another instance of a design, pattern and practice of corporate deception, a Corporate ne're do well foisting its malfeasance unto the shoulders of the American (and World) Public. We are dealing with the lowest of the low. MCAD will have to fumigate the hallways when these guys walk in, what a bunch of corporate scum-sucking rats. Friday's filing.
Unbelievably, Citibank has the nerve to call me a scammer after they refused to open a bank account for me but opened one for my Caucasian girlfriend. We see who the real scammers are:
This is but one part of the 66 page Complaint: c. Citibank Loans Disguised as "Minority Interest" Transactions
85. The secret loans to Enron that Citibank and Enron disguised as minority interest transactions, knowing Enron would improperly [*39] report the loan proceeds as minority interests and would improperly fail to report the repayment obligations as debt, included the following:
(a) a $ 500 million secret loan from Citibank to Enron, originated in or about December 1997, as part of "Project Nighthawk;"
(b) a $ 750 million secret loan from Citibank to Enron, originated in or about December 1998, as part of "Project Rawhide;" and
(c) a $ 500 million secret loan from Citibank to Enron, originated in or about December 1999, as part of "Project Nahanni."
Anyway, I told you about the dark-skinned Islamic woman who was threatened with expulsion from a Chicago area Citibank branch earlier this week.
Institutions like Citibank (and in particular Citibank) are the very reason this Country is so screwed up today and that's a FACT. Foul, simply foul. Sam, the stakes are high and climbing higher. Stop supporting the Corporate Devil incarnate -- are you ready for that Omelette and a Mimosa yet? Barring that, here is today's filing.
